Abdul Hakkim v. Febitha
Case brief
What is this about?
This matrimonial appeal, heard in absence of the appellant, was dismissed as it appeared on the defect list. No other operative relief is mentioned.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.D.RAJAN
TUESDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2013/23RD MAGHA 1934
Mat.Appeal.No. 26 of 2011 ( ) ----------------------------AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE OF THE FAMILY COURT, MALAPPURAM IN OP NO.482/2009 DATED 29.03.2010
APPELLANT(S)/APPELLANT/RESPONDENT:
V.N.ABDUL HAKKIM, AGED 40 YEARS, S/O.NAGOORKUTTY RESIDING AT VAKKAYIL HOUSE, NORTH PARAVOOR VILLAGE ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, NOW RESIDING AT VAKKAYIL HOUSE VARANDARAPPILLY, VARANDARAPPILLY, P.O. THRISSUR DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.T.P.SANTHOSH KUMAR
RESPONDENT(S)/PETITIONER:
FABITHA, AGED 20 YEARS, D/O.SHAKKEER.M.K, MANJERI KURIKKAL HOUSE POOKKUTH P.O., PANDIKKAD, NOW RESIDING AT E.C.HOUSE, KOOTILANGADI, ON THE WAY TO GOVT.U.P.SCHOOL, KOOTTILANGADI P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT-676 506.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
V.N. Abdul Hakkim
- respondent
Fabitha
Coram
Pius C. Kuriakose
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court