M.Gokuldas v. Secretary
Case brief
What is this about?
In a writ petition, the petitioner sought a direction for the Respondent to consider his proposed clash-free timings while settling transport permit timings. The Court directed the Respondent to settle timings within one month.
What did the court decide?
Respondent directed to settle timings within one month of receiving a copy of the judgment.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE HARUN-UL-RASHID
TUESDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2012/27TH AGRAHAYANA 1934
WP(C).No. 29417 of 2012 (B)
PETITIONER(S):
M.GOKULDAS, S/O. MUTHU EZHUTHACHAN, VADAKKEVEEDU, KAZHANI, CHUNGAM, ALATHUR, PALAKKAD.
BY ADV. SRI.I.DINESH MENON
RESPONDENT(S):
THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, PALAKKAD - 678 001.
BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.G.GOPAKUMAR
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18-12-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Regional Transport Authority is directed to consider the petitioner's suggested clash-free timings when settling permits.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
M.Gokuldas
- respondent
The Secretary, Regional Transport Authority, Palakkad
Coram
Harun-ul-Rashid
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court