not exceed Rs.3,00,000/- in a single account and Rs.6,00,000/- in a joint account, that the petitioner has not violated rules 4 and 5 of the MIA Rules, that she had deposited the sum of Rs.60,000/only in a single account and her share in the joint accounts opened by her and her husband was only Rs.3,00,000/- and therefore, the decision to withhold the interest paid on the two deposits on the ground that the accounts were improperly opened or were opened in violation of the MIA Rules cannot be sustained. Smt.R.Ranjini, learned counsel for the petitioner also contended that in rule 8 of the MIA Rules, as it stood in force at the time when the accounts were opened, it was stipulated that if at all in any deposit made under rule 4, the prescribed limit is exceeded, the Post Office was bound to request the subscriber to withdraw the excess deposit immediately, that even in such cases, it was stipulated that, the excess amount will also carry interest at the rate applicable from time to time to Post Office Savings Account from the date of deposit of the excess amount till the end of the month preceding the month in which the subscriber was requested to withdraw such excess amount in the account, that in the instant case, at least when all the accounts in the name of the petitioner and her husband were transferred to the Air Force Station Post Office at Lohegaon, Pune, the Post Office should have, if at all the
