Dismissed
K.K.Venugopal v. S.Roopakala Jagath
Kerala HCCon.Case(C)/159/2012
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN
THURSDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF MAY 2012/3RD JYAISHTA 1934
Con.Case(C).No. 159 of 2012 (S)
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WPC.34039/2010 DATED 17-06-2011
PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS 1 TO 9 & 11 TO 13 IN WP(C) :
1. VENUGOPALAN K.K., AGED 64 YEARS
2. BHARATHAN.P.G., AGED 68 YEARS
3. RADHAKRISHNAN.N., AGED 67 YEARS
4. M.SIVARAMAN, AGED 65 YEARS
5. KRISHNAN NAIR.S., AGED 68 YEARS S/O.LATE N.SANKARAN NAIR, ASST.ENGINEER (RETD.) KSEB, RESIDING AT 'SURABHI', BHS ROAD TRIPUNITHARA.
6. KOCHUKUNJU.P.J., AGED 67 YEARS
7. SARASWATHY.P., AGED 67 YEARS
...2/-
Con.Case(C).No. 159 of 2012 (S) -2-
8. AMBUJAKSHAN.T.N., AGED 65 YEARS
9. PRABHATH.M.K., AGED 67 YEARS
10. LOLITHA K.M.,
11. THILAKAN.T.P., AGED 66 YEARS S/O.T.C.PARAMESWARAN, SR.SUPERINTENDENT (RETD.) KSEB, RESIDING AT THANDASSERIL HOUSE, AMBALLOOR KANJIRAMATTOM P.O., ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.
12. SATHEEMANI.K., AGED 67 YEARS W/O.C.K.LAKSHMANAN, SUPERINTENDENT (RETD), KSEB RESIDING AT PUHENPURAYIL HOUSE, ERAMALLOOR P.O.
BY ADV. SRI.P.M.MOHAMMED SHIRAZ
RESPONDENT :
S.ROOPAKALA JAGATH, AGED 52 YEARS, FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO PETITIONER, SECRETARY KSEB, VYDYUTHI BHAVAN, PATTOM P.O. TRIVANDRUM-695004.
BY ADV. SRI.K.S.ANIL, SC, KSEB
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24-05-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Mn
...3/-
Con.Case(C).No. 159 of 2012 (S)
APPENDIX
PETITIONERS' ANNEXURES :
ANNEXURE-A A TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF JUDGMENT DATED 17/06/2011 IN W.P(C) NO.34039 OF 2010.
ANNEXURE-B TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF LETTER DATED 04/08/2011 OF FIFTH PETITIONER. ANNEXURE-C TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF A/D CARD SIGNED BY RESPONDENT.
RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS : NIL
//TRUE COPY//
P.S. TO JUDGE
Mn
P.N.RAVINDRAN, J.
Contempt Case (C).No.159 of 2012
Dated this the 24th day of May, 2012
JUDGMENT
Sri.K.S.Anil, learned standing counsel appearing for the Kerala State Electricity Board, submitted that the direction issued by this Court in Annexure A judgment in W.P.(C)No.34039 of 2010 regarding payment of interest has been complied with. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner does not dispute the said submission. In such circumstances I am of the opinion that no further orders are called for in this Contempt of Court Case. It is accordingly closed.
P.N.RAVINDRAN, Judge.
ahg.
P.N.RAVINDRAN, J.
Cont.Case(C).No.159 of 2012
JUDGMENT
24th May, 2012
VENUGOPALAN K.K. AND OTHERS
S.ROOPAKALA JAGATH
P.N.RAVINDRAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court