Ammini Ammal v. B.Mohanan
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner challenged an order regarding compliance with interest payment. Court found direction complied with jointly with respondents. Case closed with no further orders.
What did the court decide?
No further orders called for; case closed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN
THURSDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF MAY 2012/3RD JYAISHTA 1934
Con.Case(C).No. 335 of 2012 (S)
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WPC.37358/2010 DATED 23/06/2011
PETITIONER/PETITIONER :
AMMINI AMMAL W/O.V.A.KRISHNAN ACHARI, AGED 77 YEARS, REVATHY HOUSE, MARADU POST ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, KOCHI - 4.(CG.335/05).
BY ADVS.SRI.P.V.SANTHOSH JOSE SMT.DIVYA B.NAIR
RESPONDENT/1ST RESPONDENT:
B.MOHANAN S/O.BALAKRISHNA PILLAI, AGED 53 YEARS, SECRETARY KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, VYDHUTHI BHAVAN PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Ammini Ammal W/o.V.A.Krishnan Achari
- respondent
B.Mohananan S/o.Balakrishna Pillai
Coram
P.N.Ravindran
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court