This is a single judge order dismissing a second appeal for non-prosecution as the appellants failed to take necessary steps despite given intimation. All pending interlocutory applications were also dismissed.
Appeal dismissed. Pending interlocutory applications dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE THOMAS P.JOSEPH
MONDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF JULY 2012/8TH SRAVANA 1934
SA.NO. 217 OF 2001 ( )
AS.123/1996 OF ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT, NORTH PARAVUR OS.586/1993 OF MUNSIFF'S COURT,ALUVA
APPELLANTS/APPELLANTS/ADDITIONAL PLAINTIFFS:
1. A.P. RAJAPPAN NAIR, S/O. A. PARAMESWARAN NAIR, ATHIKKAPPILLY VEEDU, AZHAKAM KARA, KARUKUTTY VILLLAGE.
2. A.P. ASKHOK, S/O. DO. DO. DO.
3. A.P. RAJESH, S/O. DO. DO. DO.
4. A.P. VINOD, S/O. DO. DO. DO.
(APPELLANT NO.2 IN THE LOWER APPELLATE COURT DIED PENDING THE APPEAL AND HIS LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES WERE RECORDED WHO ARE APPELLANTS 3 TO 6 IN THE LOWER APPELLATE COURT (APPELLANT HEREIN)
BY ADV. SRI.S.V.BALAKRISHNA IYER (SR.)
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS/PLAINTIFF:
1. POULOSE, S/O.KUNJUVARKEY, KARUKUTTY, PANCHAYAT MEMBER, WARD NO.3, PUTHUSSERY VEETTIL, AHZAKAM KARA, KARUKUTTY VILLAGE.
S.A. No.217 OF 2001
2. VARGHESE, S/O. KUNJU VAREED, MAIPPAN VEETTIL, IN DO. DO.
3. PARAMESWARAN NAIR ALIAS MANI, H/O.SARADA, NAMBIATTU VEETTIL IN DO. DO.
4. RAJAGOPALA PILLAI, S/O. GOPALA PILLAI, AMBATTU VEETTIL IN DO. DO.
5. JOHNSON, S/O. ESTHAPPANOSE, BY ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER.
6. KARUKUTTY PANCHAYAT, REPRESENTED BY ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER.
7. JOSE, S/O. VARKEY, PYNADATHU VEETTIL AZHAKAM KARA, KARUKUTTY VILLAGE.
BY ADV. SRI.A.VIJAYAKUMAR R1 to R4 & R6
THIS SECOND APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 30-07-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
THOMAS P.JOSEPH, J.
====================================
S.A. No.217 of 2001
====================================
Dated this the 30th day of July, 2012
J U D G M E N T
The learned counsel for the appellants submitted that in spite of giving intimation to the appellants, none has turned up to take necessary steps.
The appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
All pending Interlocutory Applications will stand dismissed.
THOMAS P. JOSEPH, JUDGE.
vsv
A.P. Rajappan Nair
A.P. Ashok
A.P. Rajesh
A.P. Vinod
Poule
Varghese
Thomas P. Joseph
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
