Sajeev v. Antony
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court accepted the compromise petition filed by the parties in a regular second appeal regarding a dispute over fixing advertisement boards. A decree was passed in terms of the settlement, superseding previous judgments from the Munsiff and Sub Court.
What did the court decide?
Compromise petition accepted; decree passed in terms of compromise terms regarding advertisement boards; all pending interlocutory applications dismissed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE THOMAS P.JOSEPH
FRIDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF JULY 2012/5TH SRAVANA 1934
RSA.No. 847 of 2012 ()
AS.22/2008 of SUB COURT, MUVATTUPUZHA OS.244/2006 of MUNSIFF COURT,MUVATTUPUZHA
APPELLANT(S)/APPELLANTS/DEFENDANTS:
- SAJEEV, S/O.O.V.GEORGE, ONATTUTHOTTAHIL HOUSE, KADATHY KARA, VELLOORKUNNAM VILLAGE, MUVATTUPUZHA.
- SUNI, W/O.SAJEEV, ONATTUTHOTTATHIL HOUSE, -DO- -DO-
BY ADV. SRI.V.PHILIP MATHEW
RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF
ANTONY, S/O.VARGHESE, MANGALATH HOUSE, MUTTINAKOM KARA, VARAPPUZHA VILLAGE, VARAPPUZHA P.O., PARAVOOR, PIN 683 517.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to accept the compromise petition filed by the parties to settle the dispute.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Sajeev
- appellant
Suni
- respondent
Antony
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court