In RSA No. 74 of 2006, the Kerala High Court rejected the appellants' appeal for failure to remit the balance court fee. All pending interlocutory applications were dismissed.
Appeal rejected; pending interlocutory applications dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE THOMAS P.JOSEPH
MONDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF JULY 2012/8TH SRAVANA 1934
RSA.NO. 74 OF 2006 ( )
AS.110/2001 FIRST ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM OS.461/1994 FIRST ADDITIONAL SUB COURT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
APPELLANTS/RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS 1 TO 3:
1. GOPALAKRISHNAN NAIR, S/O. NARAYANA PILLAI, KAITHOORKONATHU KALLARATHALACKAL PUTHEN VEEDU, EDAKKODE, NEMOM P.O.
2. KAMALA KUMARI, W/O. GOPALAKRISHNAN NAIR KAITHOORKONATHU, KALLARATHALACKAL PUTHEN VEEDU EDAKKODE, NEMOM P.O.
3. RAMESH KUMAR, S/O. GOPALAKRISHNAN NAIR KAITHOORKONATHU KALLARATHALACKL PUTHEN VEEDU EDAKKODE, NEMOM P.O.
BY ADVS.SRI.M.RAJASEKHARAN NAYAR
SRI.JOHN K.JOSEPH(SAJAN) SMT.K.N.RAJANI SMT.MANJUSHA MOHANDAS
RESPONDENTS/APPELLANTS/PLAINTIFFS:
1. VIMALA KUMARI AMMA, D/O. GOMATHI PILLAI, MATHRAKONATHU VEEDU AMACHAL MURI, KULATHUMMAL VILLAGE.
2. VIJAYAN NAIR, S/O. VELAYUDHAN PILLAI OF DO.
R.S. A. No.74 of 2006
3. SUJATHAVALLI. S., D/O. SUMATHI AMMA, KAITHOORKONATHU KALLARATHALACKAL PUTHEN VEEDU EDAKODE, NEMOM P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
4. SYLAJAKUMARI, RESMI NIVAS, THRIKANJIRAPURAM, KATTAKADA, AMACHAL P.O. THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
5. REVATHI. S. (MINOR) OF DO.
6. RESMI. S. (MINOR) OF DO.
(RESPONDENTS 5 AND 6 ARE REPRESENTED BY THERE MOTHER AND GUARDIAN, 4TH RESPONDENT)
BY ADV. SRI.G.S.REGHUNATH
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 30.07.2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
THOMAS P.JOSEPH, J.
====================================
R.S.A. No.74 of 2006
====================================
Dated this the 30th day of July, 2012
J U D G M E N T
Appellants have filed I.A. No. 1636 of 2012 seeking permission to withdraw the appeal.
to be rejected.
The appeal is rejected for non-payment of the balance court fee. No costs.
All pending Interlocutory Applications will stand dismissed.
THOMAS P. JOSEPH, JUDGE.
vsv
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the regular second appeal should be rejected due to non-payment of balance court fee.
Gopalakrishnan Nair
Kamala Kumari
Ramesh Kumar
Vimala Kumari Amma
Vijayan Nair
Sujathavalli. S.
Thomas P. Joseph
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
