Disposed

Perumbavoor Range Madhya Vyavasaya Thozhilali Union (Citu) v. Shri T.N.Ashok Kumar

Kerala HC22 May 2012Con.Case(C)/660/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a contempt case alleging disobedience of an order under section 17B of the Industrial Disputes Act, the High Court closed the proceedings as the respondent submitted an affidavit confirming payment of dues and an undertaking to make future monthly payments.

What did the court decide?

The Contempt Case is closed with no further orders.

Perumbavoor Range Madhya Vyavasaya Thozhilali Union… — Service and Employment | Kerala HC (2012)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN

¶4

TUESDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF MAY 2012/1ST JYAISHTA 1934

¶5

Con.Case(C).No. 660 of 2012 (S)

¶6

[ARISING FROM ORDER DTD. 26/07/2011 PASSED IN I.A. NO.2417/2011 IN W.P.(C).NO.35980/2010 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT]

¶7

PETITIONER/PETITIONER/RESPONDENT NO.2:

¶8

PERUMBAVOOR RANGE MADHYA VYAVASAYA THOZHILALI UNION (CITU), REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, PERUMBAVOOR.

¶9

BY ADVS.SRI.RAJESH NAIR, SRI.BIJOY CHANDRAN.

¶10

RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT NO.I - PETITIONER:

¶11

SHRI T.N.ASHOK KUMAR,

¶12

(AGE & FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, MANAGING PARTNER, ARUNA TOURIST HOME, A.M. ROAD, PERUMBAVOOR - 683 542.

¶13

BY ADVS. SRI.A.JAYASANKAR, SRI.MANU GOVIND, SRI.ANIL VINCENT.

¶14

THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 22-05-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶15

Prv.

¶16

CONT. CASE (C).NO.660/2012-S:

¶17

APPENDIX

¶18

PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES:

¶19

ANNEXURE 1: COPY OF THE ORDER DTD. 26/07/2011 PASSED IN I.A. 2417/2011 BY THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM. ANNEXURE 2: COPY OF THE LETTER DTD. 12/08/2011 SEND BY WORKMAN TO THE RESPONDENT. ANNEXURE 3: COPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGMENT CARD OF ANNEXURE 2: ANNEXURE 4: COPY OF THE ORDER PASSED BY THE DIVISION BENCH OF THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF KERALA IN W.A. NO. 1274/2011. ANNEXURE 5: LETTER BY WORKMAN TO THE RESPONDENT. ANNEXURE 6: COPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGMENT CARD OF ANNEXURE 5.

¶20

RESPONDENTS' ANNEXURES: NIL.

//TRUE COPY//

P.S. TO JUDGE.

Prv.

P.N.RAVINDRAN, J.

¶25

Contempt Case (C).No.660 of 2012 ----------------------------------------Dated this the 22^nd day of May, 2012

¶26

JUDGMENT

¶27

This Contempt Case is filed alleging that the respondent herein has willfully disobeyed Annexure 1 order passed by this Court under section 17B of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. When the Contempt Case came up for admission hearing on 12.4.2012 this Court passed the following order:-

¶28

“Admit. Issue urgent notice returnable in ten days to respondents. If the direction issued by this Court in Annexure - 1 order is not complied with and an affidavit to that effect is not filed on or before 21.5.2012, the respondent shall appear in person at 10.15 am on 22.5.2012.”

¶29

The respondent has filed an affidavit dated 18.5.2012 stating inter

¶30

alia that he has effected payment of Rs.1,02,000/- by demand draft drawn on Dhanalakshmi Bank, Kuruppampady branch and that the said amount represents the wages payable for the period from 1.12.2010 to 30.4.2012. He has also undertaken to make monthly payments as ordered by this Court without fail. In such circumstances as the respondent has, though belatedly, complied

¶31

Cont.Case(C).No.660 of 2012

¶32

-:2:-

¶33

with Annexure 1 order passed under section 17B of the Industrial Disputes Act and has also undertaken to continue to pay monthly payments as ordered by this Court so long as the writ petition is pending, I am of the opinion that no further orders are called for in this Contempt Case. It is accordingly closed.

¶34

P.N.RAVINDRAN, Judge.

¶35

ahg.

¶36

P.N.RAVINDRAN, J.

¶37

Cont.Case(C).No.660 of 2012

¶38

JUDGMENT

¶39

22^nd May, 2012

Perumbavoor Range Madhya Vyavasaya Thozhilali Union (Citu) v. Shri T.N.Ashok Kumar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Perumbavoor Range Madhya Vyavasaya Thozhilali Union (Citu) v. Shri T.N.Ashok Kumar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M.Vrinda Devi Vs Roopkala S.Jagath

M.N.Ravunni Vs Roopkala S.Jagath

Joseph Manoj.O.X. Vs Additional Registering Authority & Anor

Susan Koshy Vs T.T.Antony I.A.S

Kamalakaran Vs K.G.Mohanlal

Perumbavoor Range Madhya Vyavasaya Thozhillali Union (Citu) Vs Shri.T.N.Asok Kumar