This single-paragraph order disposes of a contempt proceeding by observing that the direction regarding gratuity payment from a connected writ petition has been complied with, accordingly closing the case without further orders.
Contempt case closed; no further orders called for.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN
MONDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF MAY 2012/31ST VAISAKHA 1934
Con.Case(C).No. 450 of 2012 (S) IN WPC NO. 34946/2010
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WPC. 34946/2010 DATED
PETITIONER(S):
1. M.N.RAVUNNI, AGED 66 YEARS AGED 66 YEARS, S/O.M.S.NANU, MANITHRARA HOUSE PERINGAVU POST, PERINGAVU VILLAGE TRISSUR DISTRICT (GC.150/04).
2. P.K.CYRIAC`
3. A.J.PAUL AGED 63 YEARS, S/O.JOSEPH, ARIMBOOR HOUSE KOLAZHY POST, KOLADY VILLAGE TRISSUR DISTRICT (GC 25/05).
BY ADVS.SRI.P.V.SANTHOSH JOSE SMT.DIVYA B.NAIR
RESPONDENT(S)/1ST RESPONDENT:
ROOPKALA S. JAGATH AGED 52 YEARS, (HUSBAND'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) SECRETARY KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, VYDHUTHI BHAVAN PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.-695001.
BY SRI. K. S. ANIL, SC, KSEB
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21-05-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
DCS
Con.Case(C).No. 450 of 2012 (S)
APPENDIX
PETITIONER(S) ANNEXURE :-
EXHIBIT A1: THE CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 17/06/2011 PASSED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT IN WP(C) 34946 /2010
RESPONDENTS' ANNEXURE :- NIL
/TRUE COPY/
P.A. TO JUDGE
DCS
P.N.RAVINDRAN, J.
----------------------------------------Contempt Case (C).No.450 of 2012 ----------------------------------------Dated this the 21st day of May, 2012
JUDGMENT
Sri.K.S.Anil, learned standing counsel appearing for the Kerala State Electricity Board, submitted that the direction issued by this Court in Annexure A1 judgment in W.P.(C)No.34946 of 2010 regarding payment of principal amount of gratuity has been complied with. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner does not dispute the said submission. In such circumstances I am of the opinion that no further orders are called for in this Contempt of Court Case. It is accordingly closed.
P.N.RAVINDRAN, Judge.
ahg.
P.N.RAVINDRAN, J.
Cont.Case(C).No.450 of 2012
JUDGMENT
21st May, 2012
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
WPC 34946/2010 dated 17/06/2011Referred¶29
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M.N.Ravunni
P.K.Cyriac
A.J.Paul
Roopakala S. Jagath
P.N.Ravindran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
