A physically handicapped petitioner sought re-appointment in the 1st respondent Co-Operative Bank. The High Court directed the Bank to appoint her in a suitable vacancy within four weeks without expressing an opinion on the merits of the case.
Bank directed to appoint petitioner in a suitable vacancy within four weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.P.RAY
TUESDAY, THE 6TH DECEMBER 2011 / 15TH AGRAHAYANA 1933
WP(C).No. 22527 of 2003(F)
--------------------------
PETITIONER
--------------TERESA V.R., VALIYA PARAMBIL KAKKANAD, ERNAKULAM
BY ADV. SRI.ASOK M.CHERIAN
RESPONDENTS:
---------------
1. THE ERNAKULAM DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE BANK, REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER KAKKANAD, ERNAKULAM
2. THE REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
R1 BY ADV. SRI.P.V.SURENDRANATH ,SC R2 BY GOVT.PLEADER SRI.RIJI JOSEPH
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 06/12/2011. THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JM
WP(C).No. 22527 of 2003
APPENDIX
PETITIONERS EXHIBITS:
RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS:
\TRUE COPY\
PA TO JUDGE
JM
B.P. RAY, J.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C) No. 22527 of 2003
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Dated this the 6th day of December, 2011.
JUDGMENT
The petitioner who is a physically handicapped person and who was engaged as a provisional hand through Employment Exchange in Ernakulam District Co-Operative Bank during the period from 01.01.1997 to 14.08.1998, seeks a direction to the 1st respondent to re-appoint her in service in compliance with Ext.P3 order of the 2nd respondent.
W.P.(C) No. 22527/2003
-:2:-
the Bank to appoint the petitioner in a suitable vacancy without prejudice to the contentions raised in the writ petition. The petitioner shall be given appointment within four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. It is made clear that I have not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. It is also made clear that this order will not be a precedent to any other case.
This writ petition is allowed as above.
sd/- B.P. RAY, JUDGE.
rv
W.P.(C) No. 22527/2003
-:3:-
B.P. RAY, J.
O.P.No. 13887 of 2002
Dated this the 16th day of November, 2011.
JUDGMENT
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner, a physically handicapped person, deserves re-appointment in the 1st respondent bank in compliance with a prior order.
Whether the petitioner should be given appointment within four weeks.
Teresa V.R.
Ernakulam District Co-Operative Bank
Registrar of Co-Operative Societies Thiruvananthapuram
B.P. Ray
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
