Court issued directions for fresh representation by the petitioner to recover the medical reimbursement balance after declaring the petition open for final disposal. No final decision on merits was recorded.
Directions to make fresh representation and consider the claim within three months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.P.RAY
SATURDAY, THE 3RD DECEMBER 2011 / 12TH AGRAHAYANA 1933
WP(C).No. 2844 of 2005(L)
-------------------------
PETITIONER:
---------------
GEETHA PRASAD, U.D.CLERK (HG), SEWERAGE SECTION NO.1, UNDER SEWERAGE SUB DIVISION, KERALA WATER AUTHORITY, KURIYATHI, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
BY ADVS. DR.K.P.SATHEESAN
SRI.K.K.GOPINATHAN NAIR SRI.M.R.JAYAPRASAD SRI.K.K.RAJEEV SRI.T.K.KAMALJITH
RESPONDENTS:
---------------------
1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, GOVT.SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
2. KERALA WATER AUTHORITY, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, JALA BHAVAN, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
R1 - BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. M.G. LISHA. R2 - BY ADV. SRI.BABU VARGHESE, SC, KWA
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 03/12/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Scl.
WP(C).No. 2844 of 2005(L)
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:
RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS
R2(a): TRUE COPY OF THE DETAILS OF THE BILLS.
TRUE COPY
PA TO JUDGE
Scl.
B.P. RAY, J.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C) No.2844 of 2005
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Dated this the 3rd day of December, 2011.
JUDGMENT
The petitioner has filed this writ petition with the following
prayers:
1,49,000/- as medical advance on request from her. The petitioner's father had undergone cardiac operation at Amrutha Institute of Medical Scinences, Ernakulam for which she incurred an expenditure of 1,87,843/-. She claimed reimbursement of the said amount. But the Authority has sanctioned only an amount of `1,34,546/-. The petitioner submitted a representation to the first respondentW.P.(C) No. 2844/2005
-:2:-
requesting to sanction the balance amount of `53,297/-. But so far no action has been taken by the respondents. Hence this writ petition.
This writ petition is disposed of as above.
sd/- B.P. RAY, JUDGE.
rv
W.P.(C) No. 2844/2005
-:3:-
B.P. RAY, J.
O.P.No. 13887 of 2002
Dated this the 16th day of November, 2011.
JUDGMENT
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to the balance reimbursement towards medical expenses of her father.
Whether the limits for medical reimbursement should be strictly applied as an instance of penalisation.
Geetha Prasad
State of Kerala
Kerala Water Authority
B.P. Ray
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court