The High Court of Kerala dismissed the land acquisition appeal filed by NTPC Kayamkulam, noting that the enhancement rate in the impugned judgment was below one percent, finding no justification to entertain the matter further.
The appeal was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.BALAKRISHNAN
TUESDAY, THE 18TH JANUARY 2011 / 28TH POUSHA 1932
LA.App..No. 126 of 2005() -------------------------
(LAR NO.31 OF 1999 COURT OF SUB JUDGE MAVELIKARA)
APPELLANT(S)/2ND RESPONDENT IN L.A.R.:
THE NATIONAL THERMAL POWER CORPORATION LTD., KAYAMKULAM-REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF MANAGER (HR).
BY ADV. SRI.V.J.JOSEPH
RESPONDENT(S)/CLAIMANTS & THE 1ST RESPONDENT IN LAR :
ADV. SRI.B.RENJITHKUMAR FOR R1,2
BY GOVT.PLEADER SMT.R.BINDU
THIS LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18/01/2011, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
PIUS C.KURIAKOSE & N.K.BALAKRISHNAN, JJ.
L.A.A.No. 126 OF 2005
Dated this the 18h day of January, 2011 JUDGMENT
Pius C.Kuriakose, J.
No representation for the appellant, the requisitioning authority NTPC Kayamkulam. We notice from the impugned judgment that for both wet lands and dry lands the rate of enhancement granted under the impugned judgment is below cent percent. Having regard to the decisions taken by this court in other cases pertaining to the same acquisition, there is no justification for entertaining this appeal any longer. The appeal will stand dismissed.
PIUS C.KURIAKOSE,JUDGE
N.K.BALAKRISHNAN, JUDGE
dpk
The National Thermal Power Corporation Ltd., Kayamkulam
Peethambaran
Ambujakshi
State of Kerala
Pius C. Kuriakose
N. K. Balakrishnan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
