K.P.Wilson v. M.E.Thomas
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court observed that petitioners, alleging innocent purchase of property, should avail the statutory remedy provided under Section 83(1) of the Kerala Revenue Recovery Act instead of seeking declaration via writ.
What did the court decide?
Coercive proceedings kept in abeyance for one month; permission granted to file statutory revision under Section 83(1) of the Kerala Revenue Recovery Act.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON
MONDAY, THE 11TH JANUARY 2010 / 21TH POUSHA 1931
WP(C).No. 773 of 2010(V)
PETITIONER(S):
- K.P.WILSON,
KIZHAKKUNTHALA HOUSE,
CHELAMATTOM, OKKAL P.O.
- PETER.M.K,
MANELIL VEEDU,
VALAYANCHIRANGARA.P.O.
- ELDHOSE T.VARGHESE,
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ declaration regarding Sales Tax arrears is maintainable when a statutory remedy under Section 83(1) of the Kerala Revenue Recovery Act is available.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
K.P. Wilson and others
- respondent
M.E. Thomas
- respondent
The Tahsildar, Kunnathnadu
- respondent
The District Collector, Ernakulam
- respondent
State of Kerala
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court