N.K.Sunil Kumar v. Dena Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
The court allowed the review petition to grant an extension of time for installment repayment under a banking recovery case, without altering liability.
What did the court decide?
Prayer for extension of time allowed; proceedings for sale of property may be kept in abeyance.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON
MONDAY, THE 11TH JANUARY 2010 / 21TH POUSHA 1931
RP.No. 1249 of 2009()
AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.23352/2008 ....................
REVIEW PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER
- N.K.SUNIL KUMAR, PROPRIETOR, N.K.ASSOCIATES, P.O.KOKKALUR, BALUSSERY, KOZHIKODE.
- N.K.ANIL KUMAR,
- NAGATHARAKANDI HOUSE, KOKKALUR P.O., BALUSSERY, KOZHIKODE.
BY ADV. SRI.K.I.MAYANKUTTY MATHER
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether time extension can be granted without reviewing a self-contained judgment regarding a banking dispute.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
N.K.SUNIL KUMAR
- petitioner
N.K.ANIL KUMAR
- respondent
DENA BANK
- respondent
DEPUTY TAHSILDAR (REVENUE RECOVERY)
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court