K.P.Manikandan v. Pareed
Case brief
What is this about?
Coram disposed of a contempt petition where the contemnor reported compliance with an earlier order subject to minor fee adjustment; the court dropped proceedings upon recording regrets.
What did the court decide?
Further proceedings in the contempt case are dropped.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON
WEDNESDAY, THE 19TH AUGUST 2009 / 28TH SRAVANA 1931
Con.Case(C).No. 749 of 2009(S)
-----------------------------AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.12608/2009 Dated 28/04/2009 ....................
PETITIONER(S): --------------------
K.P.MANIKANDAN, S/O. KUMARAN,
KINATEERIPARAMBIL HOUSE, PADINHAREKKARA KOOTAYIL MALAPPURAM DIST.
BY ADV. SRI.K.K.MOHAMED RAVUF
RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------
PAFREED, AGED NOT KNOWN FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN, SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, MALAPPURAM.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
K.P.MANIKANDAN
- respondent
PAFREED
Coram
P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court