The petitioner is working as a Higher Secondary School Teacher(Malayalam). This writ petition has been filed mainly with the prayer to declare that the condition imposed in Ext.P1 ceases to exist with the expiry of 2009-2010 academic year and to direct the 1st respondent to retain the petitioner in the 2nd respondent school. A scanning of the contentions raised in the writ petition would reveal that essentially the grievance of the petitioner is pertaining to the condition imposed in Ext.P1 which may entail his transfer. According to the petitioner, Ext.P2 transfer proposal has been made as though the condition in Ext.P1 is still in existence. The petitioner apprehends transfer as consequence of Ext.P2. Now raising her grievances against the said condition as also against Ext.P2, she submitted Ext.P3 before the 1st respondent. I think it is a matter to be looked into by the 1st respondent. Since Ext.P3 is pending before the 1st respondent, I do not propose to look into the merits of the contentions. This writ petition is, therefore, disposed of with a direction to the 1st