N.Ashokan v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court denied anticipatory bail outright but permitted accused to surrender for police interrogation and apply to magistrate for bail with conditions.
What did the court decide?
permit surrender for interrogation and apply to magistrate for bail with conditions
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR FRIDAY, THE 3RD DECEMBER 2010 / 12TH AGRAHAYANA 1932
Bail Appl..No. 7503 of 2010() ----------------------------------------(CRIME NO.691/2010 OF IRITTY POLICE STATION,KANNUR DISTRICT) ......
PETITIONERS/ACCUSED:
---------------------------------------
1. N.ASHOKAN, S/O.LATE KUNHIRAMAN, NARIKKODAN HOUSE, VILAMANA AMSOM DESOM, THALASSERY TALUK.
2. N.M.SAJI @ SAJEEVAN, S/O.VELAYUDHAN, NHALIYAMMAKKIL HOUSE, VILAMANA AMSOM DESOM, THALASSERY TALUK.
3. C.T.CHANDRAN, S/O.THANKAMMA, CHERIKKAVAZHAYIL, VILAMANA AMSOM DESOM, THALASSERY TALUK.
4. N.M.SHAJI, S/O.VELAYUDHAN, NHALIYAMMAKKIL HOUSE, VILAMANA AMSOM DESOM, THALASSERY TALUK.
5. K.T.RAVINDRAN, S/O.K.P.SREEDHARAN, KALAPPURATHOTTIYIL, VILAMANA AMSOM DESOM, THALASSERY TALUK.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted in the case of offences under IPC sections 143, 147, 427, 506(ii), and 392 read with 149 IPC.
Whether the petitioners can surrender to the investigating officer for interrogation under anticipatory bail conditions.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
N.ASHOKAN
- petitioner
N.M.SAJI
- petitioner
C.T.CHANDRAN
- petitioner
N.M.SHAJI
- petitioner
K.T.RAVINDRAN
- petitioner
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court