Allowed

Jameela & Others v. State of Kerala

Kerala HC3 Dec 2010Bail Appl./4097/2010

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court refused anticipatory bail in Crime No. 772/2010. The Court permitted the petitioners to surrender on December 13 or 14, 2010, for interrogation before the Magistrate, who may then grant bail on a bond of Rs. 15,000.

What did the court decide?

Direction to surrender for interrogation on 13-12-2010 or 14-12-2010; Bail to be granted by Magistrate subject to bond of Rs. 15,000 and specified conditions.

Jameela & Others Vs State of Kerala — Bail and Remand | Kerala HC (2010)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT :

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR

¶4

FRIDAY, THE 3RD DECEMBER 2010 / 12TH AGRAHAYANA 1932

¶5

Bail Appl..No. 4097 of 2010()

¶6

----------------------------------------

¶7

CRIME NO.772/2010 OF THE KOTTIYAM POLICE STATION, KOLLAM DISTRICT .......

¶8

PETITIONRS/ACCUSED

¶9

--------------------------------------

¶10

1. JAMEEL.S.AGED 34 YEARS, SUJAHUDEEN, J.J.MANZIL, NEDUMPANA P.O., KOLLAM DISTRICT.

¶11

2. SUJAHUDEEN, AGED 64 YEARS, J.J.MANZIL, NEDUMPANA P.O., KOLLAM DISTRICT.

¶12

3. JALEEL,AGED 36 YEARS,S/O.SUJAHUDEEN, J.J.MANZI, NEDUMPANA P.O., KOLLAM DISTRICT.

¶13

4. JABEER,AGED 23 YEARS, S/O.SUJAHUDEEN, J.J.MANZI, NEDUMPANA P.O., KOLLAM DISTRICT.

¶14

5. SAINABHA, J.J.MANZI, NEDUMPANA P.O., KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.C.RAJENDRAN

¶15

RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANT

¶16

--------------------------------------------------

¶17

STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SUB INSEPCTOR OF POLICE, KOTTIYAM POLICE STATION THROUGH THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.

¶18

BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.C.S.HRITHWIK

¶19

THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/12/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

¶20

tss

¶21

V. RAMKUMAR, J.

¶22

.........................................

¶23

Bail Application No. 4097 of 2010

¶24

.......................................... Dated: 3rd day of December, 2010

¶25

ORDER

¶26

Petitioners who are the accused in Crime No. 772 of 2010 of Kottiyam Police Station, Kollam District for offences punishable under Sections 323, 406, 420 and 498 A read with Sec. 34 I.P.C. seek anticipatory bail.

¶27

The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the application. 3. Anticipatory bail cannot be granted in a case of this nature. But at the same time, I am inclined to permit the petitioners to surrender before the Investigating Officer for the purpose of interrogation and then to have their application for bail considered by the Magistrate having jurisdiction. Accordingly, the petitioners shall surrender before the investigating officer on 13-12-2010 or on 14-12-2010 for the purpose of interrogation and recovery of incriminating material, if any. After interrogation, petitioners shall be produced before the Magistrate concerned who on being convinced that the petitioners have been interrogated by the police, shall release the petitioners on bail on each of the petitioners executing a bond

¶28

B.A.No. 4097 /2010

¶29

-:2:-

¶30

for Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees fifteen thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the Magistrate and subject to the following conditions:-

¶31

1. Petitioners shall report before the Investigating Officer between 9 a.m. and 11 a.m. on all Wednesdays.

¶32

2. Petitioners shall make themselves available for interrogation including custodial interrogation as and when required by the Investigating Officer.

¶33

3. Petitioners shall not influence or intimidate the prosecution witnesses nor shall they attempt to tamper with the evidence for the prosecution.

¶34

4. Petitioners shall not commit any offence while on bail.

¶35

5. If the petitioners commit breach of any of the above conditions, the bail granted to them shall be liable to be cancelled.

¶36

This petition is disposed of as above.

¶37

Dated this the 3rd day of December, 2010.

¶38

V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE

¶39

ani

Jameela & Others v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jameela & Others v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jagdish Vs State of Kerala

E.v.Manu Vs State of Kerala

Shyam Nair Vs State

Rahul Bhuleyan Vs State of Kerala

N.Ashokan Vs State

Abdul Nasar Vs State of Kerala