Allowed

Rahul Bhuleyan v. State of Kerala

Kerala HC3 Dec 2010Bail Appl./6725/2010

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in a Section 498-A case, the Court granted the petitioner anticipatory bail for one month upon executing a bond with sureties, subject to conditions of report, interrogation, and surrender before the Magistrate.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted for one month with sureties and conditions to surrender for regular bail.

Rahul Bhuleyan Vs State of Kerala — Domestic Violence | Kerala HC (2010)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT :

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR FRIDAY, THE 3RD DECEMBER 2010 / 12TH AGRAHAYANA 1932

¶4

Bail Appl..No. 6725 of 2010() ---------------------------------------(CRIME NO.963/2010 OF KALAMASSERY POLICE STATION, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT)

¶5

PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.1: ------------------------------------------------

¶6

RAHUL BAHULEYAN, AGED 31 YEARS, S/O.BAHULEYAN P.A., THOPPIL, APPARTMENT NO.D1, REEHA CASTLE, VATTEKUNNAM, EDAPPALLY NORTH P.O., ERNAKULAM.

¶7

BY ADVS. SRI.TOJAN J. VATHIKULAM, SRI.K.B.RAJESH, SRI.M.V.BIPIN, SRI.V.P.PRASANTH.

¶8

RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANT: ----------------------------------------------------

¶9

STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KALAMASSERY POLICE STATION REPRESENTED THROUGH PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA.

¶10

BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.C.S.HRITHWIK

¶11

THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03/12/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

¶12

Kss

¶13

V. RAMKUMAR, J.

¶14

Bail Application No.6725 of 2010

¶15

Dated this the 03^rd day of December, 2010

¶16

ORDER

¶17

In this Petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. the petitioner who is accused No.1 in Crime No.963 of 2010 of Kalamassery Police Station for an offence punishable under Section 498-A read with Section 34 I.P.C., seeks anticipatory bail.

¶18

I heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor.

¶19

Having regard to the nature of the allegations levelled against the petitioner and the other circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, a direction is issued to the officer-in-charge of the police station concerned to release the petitioner on bail for a period of one month in the event of his arrest in connection with the above case on his executing a bond for `15,000/-(Rupees Fifteen thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the said officer and subject to the following conditions:-

¶20

Bail Appln.No.6725/2010 -:2:-

¶21

The petitioner shall report before the Investigating Officer between 9 a.m. and 11 a.m. on all Wednesdays.

¶22

The petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation including custodial interrogation as and when required by the Investigating Officer.

¶23

The petitioner shall not influence or intimidate the prosecution witnesses nor shall he attempt to tamper with the evidence for the prosecution.

¶24

The petitioner shall not commit any offence while on bail.

¶25

Before the expiry of the aforesaid period of one month, the petitioner shall surrender before the Magistrate concerned and seek regular bail.

¶26

If the petitioner commits breach of any of the above conditions, the bail granted to him shall be liable to be cancelled.

¶27

This application is allowed as above.

¶28

V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE

¶29

skj

Rahul Bhuleyan v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rahul Bhuleyan v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jagdish Vs State of Kerala

E.v.Manu Vs State of Kerala

Shyam Nair Vs State

Jameela & Others Vs State of Kerala

N.Ashokan Vs State

Abdul Nasar Vs State of Kerala