Augustine v. Kadamakkudy Grama Panchayath
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner challenged the first respondent's inaction. The Court noted an injunction blocked the way ahead. It directed no order, leaving the petitioner to seek relief in the civil court regarding the injunction.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN
MONDAY, THE 22ND JUNE 2009 / 1ST ASHADHA 1931
WP(C).No. 15293 of 2009(F)
-------------------------------------
PETITIONER(S):
------------------------
AUGUSTIN, KOLLANSHERY HOUSE, PIZHALA, KADAMAKKUDY VILLAGE, KANAYANNUR TALUK.
BY ADVS.MR.K.R.VINOD
MR.K.V.VINOD MR.K.P.WILSON (KALA PRATHIBHA)
RESPONDENT(S):
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the first respondent's inaction regarding Ext.P3 warrants an order from this Court given an injunction is in operation.
Whether the petitioner can seek relief in the civil court regarding the injunction order.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
AUGUSTIN
- respondent
KADAMAKKUDY GRAMA PANCHAYATH
- respondent
FRANCIS
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court