This review petition challenging the judgment in W.P.(C).28592/2008 was dismissed by this Court on the same day it was admitted for hearing, as the petitioner was a party to the underlying dispute though represented separately.
The review petition was dismissed in its entirety.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI THURSDAY, THE 22ND JANUARY 2009 / 2ND MAGHA 1930
RP.No. 23 of 2009(D)
-------------------AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.28592/2008
REVIEW PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER
P.O.AUGUSTINE, S/O.OUSEPH, AGED 65, PANDAMPADATHIL, VAYALA P.O., KOTTAYAM.
BY ADV. SRI.K.C.CHARLES
RESPONDENT(S):
BY SC SRI. K.PRABHAKARAN
THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22/01/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
V.GIRI, J
R.P.23/2009 in W.P.(C).28592/2008 -------------------Dated this the 22nd day of January, 2009
ORDER
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the KSRTC
Mr.K.Prabhakaran.
Mr.Prabhakaran affirms that the operation on the present route, pursuant to the directions issued by this Court, is more beneficial to the KSRTC. In the circumstances, I do not find any grounds to review the judgment. Review Petition is accordingly, dismissed.
V.GIRI, Judge
mrcs
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the review petition filed challenging the judgment in a writ petition concerning KSRTC route operation warrants admission and review.
P.O. Augustine
K.S. Sudarsanan Nair
Kerala State Road Transport Corporation
District Transport Officer
Assistant Transport Officer
V. Giri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
