In a contempt of court case, the accused contends that the application would be considered in the next RTA meeting. The court closes the matter without prejudice, preserving the petitioner's right to seek reopening if circumstances warrant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI
TUESDAY, THE 20TH JANUARY 2009 / 30TH POUSHA 1930
Con.Case(C).No. 48 of 2009(S) ----------------------------AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.26522/2008 Dated 07/11/2008 ....................
PETITIONER(S):
UMMER K.H,AGED 40 YRS,S/O HAMEED, KURIKKAPEEDIKA HOUSE,CHAZHOOR.P.O,THRISSUR.(OWNER OF SC VEHICLE KL-8/D-5545).
BY ADV. SRI.SHOBY K.FRANCIS
RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENT
P.R.RENJAN, AGED ABOUT 50 YRS,(FATHERS NAME NOT KNOWN TO THIS PETITIONER),SECRETARY,RTA, THRISSUR.
BY GP SMT.LAKSHMI RANI
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20/01/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
V.GIRI, J
C.O.C.48/2009
Dated this the 20th day of January, 2009
JUDGMENT
Learned Government Pleader submits that the petitioner's application is scheduled to be considered in the next RTA meeting and that a decision will be taken in the next meeting itself. Submission is recorded. Contempt of Court case is accordingly, closed without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to seek a re-opening of the same, if the circumstances so warrant.
V.GIRI, Judge
mrcs
UMMER K.H
P.R.RENJAN
V.GIRI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
