The High Court at Ernakulam dismissed an original petition seeking direction to assign field work instead of tapping work to a retired petitioner with physical disability against the Plantation Corporation of Kerala Ltd as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI
FRIDAY, THE 23RD JANUARY 2009 / 3RD MAGHA 1930
OP.No. 3658 of 1999(I)
PETITIONER(S):
BABY AMBOOKKAN, W/O PAPPACHAN, AGED 48 YEARS, PARAMBI HOUSE, AROORMOZHI, VETTILAPARA P.O., THRISSUR
BY ADV. SRI.V.RAJENDRAN SRI.GEORGE VARGHESE SRI.K.SETHUNATH
RESPONDENT(S):
ADV. SRI.JOSEPH MARKOSE (SR.)
THIS ORIGINAL PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 23/01/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
V.GIRI, J
O.P.3658/1999
Dated this the 23rd day of January, 2009
JUDGMENT
Petitioner has approached this Court for a direction to the respondents to engage her for field work instead of tapping work in the first respondent Corporation, on account of her physical disability as evidenced by Ext.P6. Mr.Joseph Kodianthara, learned counsel for the first respondent submits that she has already retired from service. No further orders are necessary in the Original Petition. Accordingly, the same is dismissed as infructuous.
V.GIRI, Judge
mrcs
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to be engaged for field work instead of tapping work due to physical disability.
BABY AMBOOKKAN
THE PLANTATION CORPORATION OF KERALA LTD
V. GIRI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
