The Court considered an application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC. The petitioners were accused of serious offences including affray and attempted murder. The Court rejected the bail plea.
Anticipatory bail to the petitioners was not granted; Bail Application dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN
TUESDAY, THE 2ND JUNE 2009 / 12TH JYAISHTA 1931
Bail Appl..No. 2263 of 2009()
----------------------------------------CRIME NO.122/2009 OF NILESWARAM POLIC STATION
PETITIONERS/ ACCUSED:
BY ADV. SRI.M.V.AMARESAN
RESPONDENT/ COMPLAINANT:
STATE, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.
SRI. TEK CHAND, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 02/06/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
K.T. SANKARAN, J.
B.A. No. 2263 of 2009
Dated this the 2nd day of June, 2009
O R D E R
This is an application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The petitioners are accused Nos.1 to 5 in Crime No.122/2009 of Nileswaram Police Station.
B.A. No. 2263/2009
2
case, the nature of the offence, the injury sustained and other circumstances, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
The Bail Application is accordingly dismissed.
K.T. SANKARAN, JUDGE
scm
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioners in a case involving affray, culpable homicide, and murder.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
C.K. JAYACHANDRAN ORS.
STATE
K.T. SANKARAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
