The petitioner's application for anticipatory bail regarding offences under the Abkari Act was dismissed on June 2, 2009, as the court found her not entitled to bail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN
TUESDAY, THE 2ND JUNE 2009 / 12TH JYAISHTA 1931
Bail Appl..No. 1898 of 2009
CRIME NO.6 OF 2009 OF THANKAMANI EXCISE RANGE
PETITIONER/ACCUSED
AMMINI D/O. KUNHAN, AGED 56 YEARS, PARATHODU, KONNATHADI, UDUMBANCHOLA, IDUKKI DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.BABU S. NAIR
RESPONDENT: STATE
THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE EXCISE INSPECTOR, THANKAMANI EXCISE RANGETHROUGH THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI-31.
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.M.S.BREEZE
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/06/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
K.T.SANKARAN, J.
B.A. NO. 1898 OF 2009
Dated this the 2nd June, 2009
O R D E R
This is an application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The petitioner is the accused in Crime No.6 of 2009 of Thankamani Excise Range.
B.A. NO. 1898 OF 2009
:: 2 ::
submitted that the representation submitted by the petitioner is pending consideration.
do not think that the petitioner is entitled to get anticipatory bail.
The Bail Application is accordingly dismissed.
(K.T.SANKARAN) Judge
ahz/
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC in view of the prosecution case posessing coloured arrack.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Ammini D/o. Kunhan
The State of Kerala
K.T. Sankaran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
