The High Court of Kerala refused to grant anticipatory bail to the first accused. The offense involved trespass, pursuit, and severe beating with wooden reapers causing fracture of both legs. The court held it was not a fit case for anticipatory bail.
Anticipatory bail application dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN
MONDAY, THE 1ST JUNE 2009 / 11TH JYAISHTA 1931
Bail Appl..No. 2382 of 2009
CRIME NO.754 OF 2008 OF CHERPU POLICE STATION
APPLICANT: 1ST ACCUSED:
-------------------UNNIKRISHNAN,AGED 43, S/O.(LATE) SANKARAN NAIR, PANDIYATH HOUSE,CHOVOOR VILLAGE, POOTHARAKKAL P.O,THRISSUR TALUK. BY ADV. SRI.P.SANTHOSH (PODUVAL) SMT.R.RAJITHA
RESPONDENT: ---------------
STATE OF KERALA REP.BY SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CHERPU POLICE STATION, THROUGH THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.M.S.BREEZE
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01/06/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
K.T.SANKARAN, J.
B.A. NO. 2382 OF 2009
Dated this the 1st June, 2009
O R D E R
This is an application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The petitioner is the first accused in Crime No.754 of 2008 of the Cherpu Police Station.
B.A. NO. 2382 OF 2009
:: 2 ::
a fit case where anticipatory bail can be granted to the petitioner.
The Bail Application is accordingly dismissed.
(K.T.SANKARAN) Judge
ahz/
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail can be granted in a case alleging criminal trespass and voluntarily causing grievous hurt by dangerous weapons.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Unnikrishnan
State of Kerala
K.T. Sankaran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
