Latheef v. State of Kerala
Case brief
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT :…
What did the court decide?
Permission to withdraw the bail application is granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN MONDAY, THE 1ST JUNE 2009 / 11TH JYAISHTA 1931
Bail Appl..No. 1702 of 2009() ----------------------------CC.279/2003 of C.J.M.,KASARAGOD CRIME NO.66/03 OF KASARAGOD POLICE STATION
PETITIONER(S): ACCUSED:
---------------------------LATHEEF, S/O.CHRAKADAVU MUHAMMAD, CHEROOR KUNNU, CHEROOR POST, CHENGALA VILLAGE, KASARAGOD.
BY ADV. SRI.T.B.SHAJIMON SMT.GOVINDU P.RENUKADEVI
RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANT:
STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KASARAGOD POLICE STATION, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ERNAKULAM.
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SHRI.M.S.BREEZE
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 01/06/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
K.T.SANKARAN, J.
----------------------------------------B.A.No. 1702 of 2009
-----------------------------------------
Dated this the 1st June, 2009
O R D E R
Learned counsel for petitioner seeks permission to
withdraw the bail application Permission is granted and the bail application is dismissed as withdrawn.
K.T.SANKARAN, JUDGE
vgs.
Latheef
State of Kerala
K.T. Sankaran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court