Allowed¶28

M/S Punnami Properties v. the Adjudicating Officer

Karnataka HC12 Jun 2026WP/4765/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka HC writ petition (GM-RES) WP No.4765 of 2022, decided 12.06.2026 by M.G.S. Kamal, J. Keywords: RERA Karnataka Adjudicating Officer; Section 8 Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 application; I.A.No.1/2021; CMP No.210623/0008039/21; direction to consider application; followed Co-ordinate Bench order dated 31.01.2023 in W.P.No.4969/2022; Punnami Properties; petitioner unrepresented at hearing; neutral citation NC: 2026:KHC:28521.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondent No.1-RERA to consider the petitioner's application (I.A.No.1/2021 dated 17.11.2021 in CMP No.210623/0008039/21 under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996), if the proceedings are still pending before it. ¶28

M/S Punnami Properties Vs the Adjudicating Officer — Arbitration | Karnataka HC (2026)

¶1

NC: 2026:KHC:28521 WP No. 4765 of 2022

¶2

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶5

DATED THIS THE 12^TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026

¶6

BEFORE

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL WRIT PETITION NO. 4765 OF 2022 (GM-RES)

¶8

BETWEEN:

¶9

M/S PUNNAMI PROPERTIES REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER J.KONDAPA NAIDU FLAT NO.005, PUNNAMI BLISS APARTMENT, CHROMA ROAD, OFF MARATAHALI OUTER RING ROAD, SY NO.95/2, PANATHUR VILLAGE, BANGALORE - 560 087.

¶10

…PETITIONER

¶11

(BY SRI. B. NAGARAJAN, ADVOCATE)

¶12

AND:

¶13

Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka

¶14

THE ADJUDICATING OFFICER KARNATAKA REAL ESTATE REGULATORY AUTHORITY 2^ND FLOOR, SILVER JUBILEE BLOCK, CSI BUILDING, BANGALORE - 560 027.

¶15

MR. SATHISH KUMAR PARAMASIVAM FLAT NO.104, PUNNAMI BLISS, 1^ST FLOOR, MUNIREDDY LAYOUT, BELLANDUR RAILWAY STATION ROAD, OPP. SKY COURT, PANATHUR, BENGALURU - 560 103. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. GOWTHAMDEV C. ULLAL, ADVOCATE SRI. V. RAVIPRAKASH, ADVOCATE FOR R2)

¶16

2 - NC: 2026:KHC:28521 WP No. 4765 of 2022

¶17

HC-KAR

¶18

THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-1 TO CONSIDER THE PETITIONERS APPLICATION ON I.A.NO.1/2021 DATED 17.11.2021 AT ANNEXURE-B IN CMP NO.210623/0008039/21 ON THE FILE OF THE R-1 FILED UNDER SECTION 8 OF THE ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT 1996 AND THUS RENDER JUSTICE.

¶19

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶20

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL

¶21

ORAL ORDER

¶22

Though there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, the relief sought in the petition is for a direction to the respondent No.1-Karnataka Real Estate Regulatory Authority (for short 'RERA') to consider the application filed by the petitioner under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 in CMP. No. 210623 / 0008039 of 2021 on the file of the respondent No.1-RERA.

¶23

A memo seeking disposal of writ petition is also filed along with a copy of the Order dated 31.01.2023 passed by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in WP No.4969/2022, which was filed by the very same

¶24

3 - NC: 2026:KHC:28521 WP No. 4765 of 2022

¶25

HC-KAR

¶26

petitioner for very same relief. This Court has allowed the said petition directing respondent No.1-Authority to consider the similar application filed in the said petition.

¶27

Learned counsel for the respondents has no objection if such a direction is issued.

¶28

Since the relief sought for in the present petition has already been granted to the petitioner by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 31.01.2023 in W.P.No.4969/2022, as noted above, this petition is also allowed on similar lines and respondent No.1-RERA is directed to consider the application filed by the petitioner as noted above, if the proceedings are still pending consideration before the respondent No.1-RERA.

¶29

Sd/(M.G.S. KAMAL) JUDGE

¶30

PSJ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 5

M/S Punnami Properties v. the Adjudicating Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S Punnami Properties v. the Adjudicating Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

P.Bharathi Murthy Vs the Joint Director

K. P. Prasad Vs State of Karnataka

S Sathyendraprakash Vs Superindent of Police

Smt Priya S R Vs Canara Bank

Smt. K.N. Kalpana Vs State of Karnataka

Karnataka State Nomadic Tribes Development Organisation(R) Vs State of Karnataka