K. P. Prasad v. State of Karnataka
Case brief
What is this about?
Non-prosecution dismissal; Karnataka HC single-judge order (M.G.S. Kamal, J.) dated 11.06.2026; writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India concerning continuation of petitioner's services as Parupathedar in Sri Venugopalakrishnaswamy Temple pending final decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court in SLP (C) NO.005398/2007; no representation for petitioner on 03.06.2026 and 11.06.2026; Rs.500/- cost to High Court Legal Services Authority, Bengaluru unpaid; petition dismissed for non-prosecution.
What did the court decide?
Since there was no representation for the petitioner on successive listings and the cost earlier imposed remained unpaid, the petitioner was held not interested in prosecuting the matter, and the writ petition was dismissed for non-prosecution. ¶¶38