Disposed¶34

Karnataka State Nomadic Tribes Development Organisation(R) v. State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC12 Jun 2026WP/4293/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Ashraya Scheme; Nanjangud Taluk; Mysuru/Mysore District; representation dated 15.06.2020; Annexure-C; Article 226; Article 227; writ petition disposed with liberty; beneficiary selection; layout Sy.No.22 Golur Village Kasaba Hobli; Karnataka State Nomadic Tribes Development Organisation; WP No. 4293 of 2021; GM-RES.

What did the court decide?

Liberty reserved to the petitioner to avail of such remedy as may be available in law; no direction issued on the representation. ¶34

Karnataka State Nomadic Tribes Development… — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2026)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2026:KHC:28621 WP No. 4293 of 2021

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶5

DATED THIS THE 12^TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026

¶6

BEFORE

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL

¶8

WRIT PETITION No. 4293 OF 2021 (GM-RES)

¶9

BETWEEN:

¶10

KARNATAKA STATE NOMADIC TRIBES DEVELOPMENT ORGANISATION(R), TRIBES DEVELOPMETN ORGANISATION(R) HAVING OFFICE AT No.5, 1^ST MAIN ROAD, VAISHANAVI LAYOUT, VIDYARANYAPURA, BANGLAORE 97. REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT, SRI RAMASWAMY, S/O LATE SANJEEVAIAH, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS.

¶11

…PETITIONER

¶12

Digitally signed by SUMA B N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶13

(BY SRI SRINIVAS V., ADVOCATE)

¶14

AND:

¶15

STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO HOUSING DEPARTMENT, VIKAS SOUDHA, BANGALORE 560 001.

¶16

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, MYSORE DISTRICT, MYSORE 570 001.

¶17

¶18

NC: 2026:KHC:28621 WP No. 4293 of 2021

¶19

HC-KAR

¶20

THE TAHASILDHAR, NANJANGUD TALUK, NANJANGUD 571301.

¶21

THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, ZILLA PANCHAYATH, MYSORE DISTRICT, MYSORE 570 001.

¶22

THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER, NANJANGUD TALUK PANCHAYATH NANJANGUD 570 001

¶23

…RESPONDENTS

¶24

(BY SRI SRINIVAS KUMAR, HCGP FOR R1 TO R3; SRI CHANDRAKANTH R. GOULAY, ADVOCATE FOR R4 & R5)

¶25

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-2 TO 5 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DATED 15.06.2020 I.E., ANNEXURE-C TO THE WRIT PETITION GIVEN BY THE PETITIONER TO R-2 AND CONSEQUENTLY TO SELECT THE BENEFICIARIES AND ALSO TO CARVE THE LAYOUT OF ASHRYA SCHEME IN LAND BEARING SY.No.22 MEASURING 4 ACRE 1 GUNTAS SITUATE AT GOLUR VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, NANJANGUD TALUK.

¶26

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶27

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL

¶28

¶29

NC: 2026:KHC:28621 WP No. 4293 of 2021

¶30

HC-KAR

¶31

ORAL ORDER

¶32

The petitioner, an organization registered and having its Office at Bengaluru, appears to be espousing a public cause in relation to the Ashraya Scheme purported to have been formulated in Nanjangud Taluk, Mysuru District.

¶33

Reserving liberty to the petitioner to avail of such remedy

¶34

as may be available in law, the writ petition is disposed of .

¶35

Sd/(M.G.S. KAMAL) JUDGE

¶36

¶37

List No.: 1 Sl No.: 29

Karnataka State Nomadic Tribes Development Organisation(R) v. State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Karnataka State Nomadic Tribes Development Organisation(R) v. State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

P.Bharathi Murthy Vs the Joint Director

K. P. Prasad Vs State of Karnataka

S Sathyendraprakash Vs Superindent of Police

Smt Priya S R Vs Canara Bank

Smt. K.N. Kalpana Vs State of Karnataka

M/S Punnami Properties Vs the Adjudicating Officer