Smt Chinnamma v. the Assistant Commissioner
Case brief
What is this about?
NC: 2025:KHC:43829; WP No. 1205 of 2020 (KLR-RR/SUR); High Court of Karnataka, Bengaluru; Justice Rajesh Rai K; decided 31.10.2025; petitioner Smt Chinnamma W/o Late Shri Chinnappa; respondents: Assistant Commissioner Bengaluru North Taluk and Special Tahsildar Hessaraghatta Hobli; prayer for mutation entries and khata per representations dated 24.08.2016 (Annexure-A/B); Articles 226 and 227 Constitution of India; review petition allowed and writ restored 06.12.2024; no representation on 30.10.2025 and 31.10.2025; dismissed for non-prosecution; counsel Sri Shanmukhappa (absent); HCGP Sri Neelakantappa K. Pujar.
What did the court decide?
In view of the petitioner's continued non-representation (no appearance on 30.10.2025 even on the second call, and again none on 31.10.2025), the Court presumed that the petitioner was not interested in pursuing the writ petition and dismissed it for non-prosecution.