Sri Sandeep v. the State of Karnataka
Case brief
What is this about?
Dismissal for non-prosecution; Karnataka HC Bengaluru; W.P. No. 4989/2020 (KLR-RES); petitioner absent on 30.06.2021, 30.10.2025 and on second call; challenge to Tahsildar's eviction notice dated 28.01.2019 (Annexure-G) under Articles 226 and 227; respondents include State of Karnataka (Revenue), Deputy Commissioner and Tahsildar Davanagere, and Kuber Naik (then Village Accountant, Ulupinakatte); I.A.No.1/2019 disposed; no ruling on merits; no cases cited.
What did the court decide?
The petition is dismissed for non-prosecution, the petitioner having failed to appear through counsel on the hearing dates of 30.06.2021 and 30.10.2025 and even on the second call on the date of the order, indicating the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. ¶38