2024:KHC-D:12790 WP No. 103146 of 2021 IN…
Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution and non-compliance of office objections.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC-D:12790 WP No. 103146 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 103146 OF 2021 (T-RES)
BETWEEN:
M/S. MURUDESWAR CERAMICS LTD., REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, SRI. SATISH.R.SHETTY, 604/B, MURUDESHWAR BHAVAN GOKUL ROAD, HUBBALLI-580 030.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. RAGHAVENDRA.B.HANJER., ADVOCATE [ABSENT])
AND:
Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
NC: 2024:KHC-D:12790 WP No. 103146 of 2021
…RESPONDENTS
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER
When the matter is called, the petitioner is not represented. When the matter is listed and is called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case.
As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the petition was listed on 26.09.2022, on that day, two weeks time was granted to do the needful. Despite granting time, office objections are not complied with.
The petition is listed today for orders regarding noncompliance of office objections for the second time. A perusal of the entire order sheet reveals that despite giving sufficient opportunity, the office objections are not complied with.
Furthermore, the petition is filed in the year 2021. Now we are in the month of September 2024. The petition is pending for almost three years. As already noted above, when the matter is called, the petitioner is not represented. It appears that the petitioner is not diligent in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution and also for non-compliance of office objections.
Sd/(JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE
MRP LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 1
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M/S. Murudeswar Ceramics Ltd., represented by its Managing Director, Sri. Satish.R.Shetty
Union of India
The Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs
The Principal Commissioner of Central Excise and Service Tax
The Additional Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise (Appeals)
The Assistant Commissioner of Central Taxes, Hubballi Division
Jyoti Mulimani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
