Dismissed

Shree Renuka Sugars Limited v. the Union of India

Karnataka HC5 Sept 2024WP/102911/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court of Karnataka at Dharwad Bench dismissed Writ Petition No. 102911 of 2022 filed by Shree Renuka Sugars Limited due to its non-prosecution, absence of counsel, and failure to comply with previous directions regarding office objections under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition was dismissed for non-prosecution and non-compliance with office objections.

Shree Renuka Sugars Limited Vs the Union of… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Karnataka HC (2024)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2024:KHC-D:12794 WP No. 102911 of 2022

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,

¶4

DHARWAD BENCH

¶5

DATED THIS THE 5^TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024

¶6

BEFORE

¶7

THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 102911 OF 2022 (T-IT)

¶8

BETWEEN:

¶9

SHREE RENUKA SUGARS LIMITED, A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT KANAKSHREE ARCADE, 2^ND AND 3^RD FLOOR, JNMC ROAD, NEHRU NAGAR, BELAGAVI-590 010, REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE, MR. RAHUL PATIL S/O GANPATRAO PATIL, AGE: 41 YEARS, OCC: EMPLOYEE OF SHREE RENUKA SUGARS LIMITED, R/O: KANAKSHREE ARCADE, 2^ND AND 3^RD FLOOR, JNMC ROAD, NEHRU NAGAR, BELAGAVI-590 010. …PETITIONER

¶10

(BY SRI. VITTHAL.S.TELI., ADVOCATE [ABSENT])

¶11

Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶12

AND:

¶13

THE UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, NEW DELHI-110 001.

¶14

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, BELAGAVI, FEROJ KHIMJIBHAI COMPLEX, OPPOSITE CIVIL HOSPITAL, DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR ROAD, BELAGAVI, KARNATAKA-590 001.

¶15

…RESPONDENTS

¶16

2 - NC: 2024:KHC-D:12794 WP No. 102911 of 2022

¶17

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS.

¶18

THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR DISMISSAL, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:

¶19

ORAL ORDER

¶20

When the matter is called, the petitioner is not represented. When the matter is listed and is called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case.

¶21

As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the petition was listed on 29.08.2024, on that day, finally a week’s time was granted to comply with the office objections, failing which, the office was directed to list this matter under the caption ‘for dismissal of petition for non-compliance of office objections’ on 05.09.2024.

¶22

The petition is listed today under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Despite granting time, the office objections are not complied. The petitioner has not respected the Court order. As already noted above, when the matter is called, the petitioner is not represented. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the Writ Petition

¶23

NC: 2024:KHC-D:12794 WP No. 102911 of 2022

¶24

¶25

is dismissed for non-prosecution and also for non-compliance

¶26

of office objections.

¶27

Sd/(JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE

¶28

MRP LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 27

Shree Renuka Sugars Limited v. the Union of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shree Renuka Sugars Limited v. the Union of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The Divisional Controller Nwkrtc Vs B M Karisakkannavar

Sri.Mahantesh S/O Kotrappa Nayak Vs the Government of Karnataka

Rangappam Vaddar Since Deceased by His Lrs Shri Fakkiresh S/O Rangappa Vaddar Vs the State of Karnataka

Puttappa Ningappa Lamani Vs State of Karnataka

M/S. Murudeswar Ceramics Ltd., Vs Union of India

Sri.Dundappa S/O Parappa Halyal Vs the State of Karnataka