Revision petition under Section 19(4) of the Family Courts Act against a Family Court order partly allowing interim maintenance under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act. With no appearance by counsel, the High Court dismissed the petition for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF JULY, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI REV.PET FAMILY COURT NO. 291 OF 2022
BETWEEN:
SRI. T.M.V.MURTHY, SON OF LATE B.N. CHOWDAPPA, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/AT RAMAKRISHNA EXTENSION, SRINIVASAPUR TOWN, KOLAR DISTRICT – 563 135.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. SUNIL T., ADVOCATE (ABSENT))
AND:
Digitally signed by GEETHAKUMARI PARLATTAYA S Location: High Court of Karnataka
SMT. Y.S.PAVITHRA, W/O T.M.V. MURTHY, D/O S. SHIVAPPA, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, R/AT YANADAHALLI, HUTTUR HOBLI, KOLAR TALUK AND DISTRICT – 563 102.
…RESPONDENT THIS RPFC IS FILED U/S.19(4) OF THE FAMILY COURTS ACT., AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 16.09.2022 PASSED ON IA NO.IV IN M.C.NO.28/2021 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, KOLAR. PARTLY ALLOWING THE IA NO.IV FILED U/S.24 OF HINDU MARRIAGE ACT.
NC: 2024:KHC:27853 RPFC No. 291 of 2022
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
None appears.
Registry had raised office objections regarding
maintainability of appeal.
Since there is no appearance, petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/JUDGE
MKM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 21
2 provisions across 2 enactments
SRI. T.M.V.MURTHY
SMT. Y.S.PAVITHRA
RAVI V HOSMANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
