This miscellaneous first appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution, as the appellants failed to appear and were found indiligent in pursuing the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF JULY, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.3417 OF 2021 (CPC)
BETWEEN:
…APPELLANTS
[BY SRI GOPALA KRISHNA B N., ADVOCATE (AB)]
AND:
Digitally signed by GEETHAKUMARI PARLATTAYA S
Location: High Court of Karnataka
…RESPONDENTS
[BY SRI G.R. MOHAN, ADVOCATE FOR C/R1 TO R10; SRI C.R. RAGHAVENDRA REDDY, ADV., FOR R1 TO R10)]
THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER ORDER 43 RULE 1(r) OF CPC, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 04.06.2021 PASSED ON I.A.NO.1 IN O.S.NO.25780/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE XIII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MAYO HALL UNIT, BENGALURU (CCH22), ALLOWING THE APPLICATION FILED UNDER ORDER 39 RULE 1 AND 2 OF CPC.
NC: 2024:KHC:27254 MFA No. 3417 of 2021
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for cavetors/respondents present.
None appears for appellants.
It is seen that even on previous occasions, learned counsel for appellants has remained absent. This would indicate that appellants are not diligent in pursuing appeal. Hence, appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/JUDGE
GRD
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 37
SMT. P. GAYATHRI AND 2 OTHERS
SMT. MAYAMMA AND 9 OTHERS
RAVI V HOSMANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
