Revision against Family Court order granting maintenance to wife and daughter. Counsel for the revision petitioner stated the matter had been settled between the parties, rendering the petition infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF JULY, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI
REV.PET FAMILY COURT NO. 103 OF 2021
BETWEEN:
N. SHIVA KUMAR, S/O NANJAIAH, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/AT BASAVESHWARA EXTENSION, 1ST CROSS, OPP. TO RAILWAY STATION, KYATHASANDRA, TUMAKURU – 572 104.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. SUNIL KUMAR PATEL., ADVOCATE)
AND:
BOTH ARE R/AT 3RD CROSS, SIT EXTENSION, KRISHNAGAR, TUMAKURU – 572 102.
…RESPONDENTS
NC: 2024:KHC:27852 RPFC No. 103 of 2021
THIS RPFC IS FILED UNDER SEC.19(4) OF THE FAMILY COURTS ACT, 1984 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 24.08.2021 PASSED IN C.MISC.No.87/2015 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT AT TUMKURU ALLOWING THE PETITION FILED UNDER SEC.125 OF Cr.PC. FOR MAINTENANCE.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned counsel for petitioner submits that matter is settled between parties and in view of same, petition has rendered infructuous.
In view of submission, petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Sd/JUDGE
MKM
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 20
2 provisions across 2 enactments
N. SHIVA KUMAR
A. PUSHPA
BHOOMIKA
RAVI V HOSMANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
