Revision petition against a Family Court maintenance order insofar as the second respondent was not directed to pay maintenance. Counsel filed a memo seeking leave to withdraw, citing the petitioner's death; the High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF JULY, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI
REV.PET FAMILY COURT NO. 173 OF 2021
BETWEEN:
SMT. M.V.RAJALAKSHMI, W/O LATE M.A.VISHWANATH SHETTY, AGED 83 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.1127, 1ST A CROSS, H.A.L. 3RD STAGE, HOSA THIPESANDRA, BANGALORE – 560 075.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI PRAMOD R., ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by GEETHAKUMARI PARLATTAYA S Location: High Court of Karnataka
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI MOHAN B.K., ADVOCATE FOR R1; R2 SERVED)
THIS RPFC IS FILED UNDER SECTION 19(4) OF FAMILY COURT ACT, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 05.02.2020 PASSED BY THE III ADDITIONAL FAMILY COURT JUDGE AT MYSORE IN C.MIS.NO.586/2019 IN SO FAR AS MAINTENANCE NOT ORDERED BY THE TRIAL COURT TO BE PAYABLE BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned counsel for petitioner has filed a memo seeking leave of this Court to withdraw petition on ground of death of petitioner.
In view of memo, petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/JUDGE
MKM
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 29
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Smt. M.V. Rajalakshmi
M.V. Harish Kumar
M.V. Jagadish Kumar
Ravi V Hosmani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
