Disposed

Shivakumarappa v. the Deputy Commissioner

Karnataka HC18 Nov 2023WP/8546/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Court disposed of a writ petition challenging an interim relief order passed by the Deputy Commissioner. The petitioner sought to quash the order rejecting their interim application. The High Court directed the respondent to complete proceedings and pass a final order.

What did the court decide?

Respondent No.1 directed to complete proceedings and pass a final order within four months.

Shivakumarappa Vs the Deputy Commissioner — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Karnataka HC (2023)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2023:KHC:41378 WP No. 8546 of 2020

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶4

DATED THIS THE 18^TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2023

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.8546 OF 2020 (KLR-RES)

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

SHIVAKUMARAPPA S/O DYAMAPPA AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS AGRICULTURIST

¶9

R/O HIREBENNUR VILLAGE, BHARAMASAGARA HOBLI, CHITRADURGA TALUK-577501.

¶10

…PETITIONER

¶11

(BY SRI. R. SHASHIDHARA, ADVOCATE)

¶12

AND:

¶13

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER CHITRADURGA DISTRICT, CHITRADURGA-577501.

¶14

Digitally signed by SHARMA ANAND CHAYA Location: High

¶15

Court of Karnataka

¶16

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER CHITRADURGA SUB DIVISION CHITRADURGA-577501.

¶17

THE TAHASILDAR CHITRADURGA TALUK OFFICE CHITRADURGA-577501.

¶18

B.J. NAGARAJ S/O LATE JAYAPPA AGED 47 YEARS AGRICULTURIST R/O HIREBENNUR VILLAGE, BHARAMASAGARA HOBLI, CHITRADURGA TALUK-577501.

¶19

¶20

NC: 2023:KHC:41378 WP No. 8546 of 2020

¶21

5. MURIGEPPA

¶22

S/O LATE KENCHAPPA AGE 66 YEARS AGRICULTURIST

¶23

R/O ONION MARKET ROAD, NEAR RAILWAY UNDER PASS BRIDGE LORRY TRANSPORT OFFICE, DAVANAGERE TOWN-577001.

¶24

…RESPONDENTS

¶25

(BY SRI. MOHAMMED JAFFAR SHAH, AGA FOR R1 TO R3; SRI M.G. KANTHARAYAPPA, ADVOCATE FOR R4 AND R5)

¶26

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASHING THE ORDER PASSED BY THE 1^ST RESPONDENT DEPUTY COMMISSIONER CHITRADURGA IN RA(A)-11/2020 DATED 20.03.2020 VIDE ANNEXURE-D PRODUCED IN THE WRIT PETITION.

¶27

THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

¶28

ORDER

¶29

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties.

¶30

In this writ petition, the petitioner is assailing the order dated 20.03.2020 (Annexure-D) passed by the respondent No.1.

¶31

Having heard learned counsel appearing for the parties, the petitioner herein has challenged the order

¶32

¶33

NC: 2023:KHC:41378 WP No. 8546 of 2020

¶34

passed by the respondent No.1, rejecting the application made by the petitioner, seeking interim relief.

¶35

Without expressing any opinion on the merits of

¶36

the case, writ petition is disposed of directing the respondent No.1 to complete the proceedings and pass final order within an outer limit of four months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

¶37

SD/JUDGE

¶38

List No.: 1 Sl No.: 27

¶39

Shivakumarappa v. the Deputy Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shivakumarappa v. the Deputy Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri Kashyap N Patel Vs State of Karnataka

Sri T Rama Reddy Vs the State of Karnataka

Sowbhagya Vs the Deputy Commissioner

Smt Gangamma Vs the Deputy Commissioner

Sri S Karunakar Vs the State of Karnataka

Sri Ramakrishna Vs State of Karnataka