Disposed

Sri Ramakrishna v. State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC18 Nov 2023WP/16162/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This writ petition sought a direction for the respondent authority to consider the petitioner's representation regarding the durast/phodi of specific land. The high court directed the petitioner to make an application online as per law, stating that the request would then be considered accordingly, and disposed of the petition.

What did the court decide?

Director the petitioner to make an application through online in a manner known to law so that the application is considered in accordance with law.

Sri Ramakrishna Vs State of Karnataka — Public Procurement and Tenders | Karnataka HC (2023)

¶1

NC: 2023:KHC:41382 WP No. 16162 of 2023

¶2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶4

DATED THIS THE 18^TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2023

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.16162 OF 2023 (KLR-RR/SUR)

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

SRI. RAMAKRISHNA S/O NANJAPPA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, RESIDING AT HANDALA KUPPE VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, KUNIGAL TALUK, TUMKUR - 572130.

¶9

…PETITIONER

¶10

(BY SRI. SOMASEKHAR REDDY K., ADVOCATE)

¶11

AND:

¶12

STATE OF KARNATAKA

¶13

Digitally signed by ARUN KUMAR M S Location: High Court of Karnataka

¶14

REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, M S BUILDING, BENGALURU - 560001.

¶15

THE TAHSILDAR KUNIGAL TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT - 572130.

¶16

…RESPONDENTS

¶17

(BY SRI. HARISHA A.S., AGA )

¶18

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO

¶19

2 - NC: 2023:KHC:41382 WP No. 16162 of 2023

¶20

DIRECT OR COMMANDING THE SECOND RESPONDENT AUTHORITY TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION OF THE PETITIONER FOR CONDUCTING DURAST/PHODI OF 1 ACRE 18 GUNTAS IN SY.NO. 46 OF HANGARAHALLI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, KUNIGAL TALUK AS PER ANNEXURE-F DATED 22.04.2022.

¶21

THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

¶22

ORDER

¶23

Learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice for respondents.

¶24

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties.

¶25

In this writ petition, the grievance of the petitioner is with regard to consideration of the representation made by the petitioner seeking

¶26

phodi/durasth in respect of the subject land.

¶27

Learned Additional Government Advocate submitted it is open for the petitioner to make application

¶28

¶29

NC: 2023:KHC:41382 WP No. 16162 of 2023

¶30

through online and same will be considered in accordance with law.

¶31

In that view of the matter, the petitioner is

¶32

directed to make application through online in a manner known to law. If such application is made, the application is considered in accordance with law.

¶33

Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of.

¶34

SD/JUDGE

¶35

¶36

List No.: 1 Sl No.: 11

Sri Ramakrishna v. State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri Ramakrishna v. State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri Kashyap N Patel Vs State of Karnataka

Sri T Rama Reddy Vs the State of Karnataka

Sowbhagya Vs the Deputy Commissioner

Smt Gangamma Vs the Deputy Commissioner

Sri S Karunakar Vs the State of Karnataka

Shivakumarappa Vs the Deputy Commissioner