The court dismissed the writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India as infructuous following an affidavit filed by the petitioner stating that the underlying dispute with the petitioner's wife had been amicably settled.
Petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 09TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA
WRIT PETITION No.52633/2015 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
SANATH KUMAR NAIDU S/O. NAGARAJU G.R., AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS R/AT NO.882, 3RD CROSS, BOVI COLONY, GANDHINAGAR, TIPTUR, TUMKUR DISTRICT – 572 201 SERVING AT 5014/501 AD GP(SP), PIN – 925501 CARE OF 56 APO.
... PETITIONER
(BY SMT. APOORVA MAJAKAR, ADVOCATE FOR SRI K.S. RAMASWAMY IYENGAR, ADVOCATE)
AND:
4TH FLOOR, VAN COMPLEX NEAR PAYAL THEATRE, NEW BUS STAND ROAD, BEHRAMPUR, GANJAM DISTRICT, ODISHA – 760 002.
(BY SRI S. RAJASHEKAR, ADVOCATE FOR R-1 TO R-4 & R-5; SRI S.R. SREEPRASAD, ADVOCATE FOR R-6)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 20.10.2015, ISSUED BY THE R-2 VIDE ANNEXURE-N; AND GRANT AN INTERIM ORDER TO STAY OF THE OPERATION OF THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 20.10.2015, ISSUED BY THE R-2 VIDE ANNEXURE-N.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
O R D E R
Smt. Apoorva Majakar, learned counsel appearing for Sr K.S.Ramaswamy Iyengar, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the dispute between the petitioner-husband and respondent No.6/wife-Swapna P.S. has been amicably settled and hence, the writ petition has become infructuous. A memo is filed to this effect.
“The counsel for the petitioner respectfully submits that the parties have settled the matter. Therefore, the captioned matter may be disposed off as infructuous. The memo may kindly be taken on record in the interests of justice and equity.”
SD/-
JUDGE
S*
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sanath Kumar Naidu
Union of India
Swapna P.S.
K.S. Hemalekha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
