Petitioner challenged exclusion of ripping work from a 2015 tender notification violating Section 125[2] of Karnataka Forest Accounts Code. Court found petition infructuous due to lapse of time and filed memo, dismissing it.
Petition dismissed as having become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 09TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA
WRIT PETITION No.52466/2015 (GM-TEN)
BETWEEN:
M. SRINIVASA S/O. LATE MADAIAH, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, FOREST CONTRACTOR, R/O. SC/ST GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES EXTENSION, NEAR MANJUNATHA NAGAR, KOLLEGALA, KEMPANAPALYA ROAD WEST, KOLLEGALA – 571 440, CHAMARAJANAGAR DISTRICT. ... PETITIONER
(BY SRI NAGABHUSHANA R., ADVOCATE)
AND:
(BY SMT. K. SHOBHA, HCGP FOR R-1 TO R-3)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-3 TO EXCLUDE THE WORK OF RIPPING INCLUDING RAISING NURSERY FROM THE TENDER PROCUREMENT PORTAL PUBLISHED ON 04.11.2015 VIDE ANNEXURE-B IN VIEW OF THE PROVISIONS CONTAINED IN SECTION 125[2] OF THE KARNATAKA FOREST ACCOUNT CODE AND ETC.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
O R D E R
Learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Nagabhushana R., appeared through video conference and submitted that the petition has become infructuous in view of lapse of time, nothing remains to agitate in the matter in respect of Tender Notification of the year 2015 and today, a memo is filed to this effect, which reads as under:
placed on record and in view of the same, the petition
is dismissed as having become infructuous.
SD/JUDGE
S*
2 provisions across 2 enactments
M. SRINIVASA S/O. LATE MADAIAH
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
THE PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS
THE DEPUTY CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS
K.S. HEMALEKHA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
