Writ petition filed under Article 226/227 seeking to set aside an order in O.S. Writ petitioners sought to withdraw the petition with liberty to appeal. Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 03RD DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK.S.KINAGI
WRIT PETITION NO.2275 OF 2022 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN :
BOTH ARE R/AT NO.48, ENNAR PLAZA, SANTHRUPTHI NAGAR, J.P NAGAR 7TH PHASE, BENGALURU - 560 078.
… PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. V.ANAND., ADVOCATE)
AND:
BOTH ARE R/AT GOVINDACHETTIHALLI BEGUR HOBLI, BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK
2
... RESPONDENTS
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DTD.12.11.2021 PASSED ON IA NO.1 IN O.S.NO.597/2020 ON THE FILE OF THE V ADDITIONAL SR CIVIL JUDGE BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT AT ANNEXURE-F AND THEREBY ALLOW THE IA NO.1.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR 'ORDERS' THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R
Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks leave of
this Court to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file an appeal.
3
2. The submission is placed on record.
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the
aforesaid liberty.
Registry to return the certified copy of the impugned order after retaining a photo copy in the file.
Sd/JUDGE
ssb
2 provisions across 1 enactments
SMT. MANJULA W/O N. NANJA REDDY AND SRI. N. NANJA REDDY
SMT. PILLAMMA
SMT. ANUSUYA V.
SMT. LALITHAMMA
SMT. SUMITHRAMMA
SMT. RATHNA
ASHOK S KINAGI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
