Jayashankar v. Smt Puttamma
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition under Article 226 challenging an execution court order was dismissed as withdrawn by the petitioner, with leave to file an appeal.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGI
WRIT PETITION NO.98 OF 2022 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN:
JAYASHANKAR S/O B.S RAMANAIAH AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS R/AT NO.13/3, KONDAREDDIPALLI KASABA HOBLI BAGEPALLI TALUK CHIKABALLAPURA DISTRICT – 561 207.
...PETITIONER
(BY SMT. SUNANDA FOR RAHUL S REDDY, ADVOCATES)
AND:
- SMT. PUTTAMMA W/O LATE K.V.VEERABHADRAPPA AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS R/AT SHOP NO.4, (AJJI ANGADI) SRI SIDDAGANGA MUTT COMPOUND TUMKUR TALUK AND DISTRICT – 572 101.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Jayashankar S/O B.S Ramanaiah
- respondent
Smt. Puttamma W/O Late K.V. Veerabhadrappa
- respondent
K.S. Shivanandappa S/O Late Shivananna
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · February
- Registered
- Case no.
- WP/98/2022
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court