The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking to quash orders passed in O.S. No. 95/2013. Upon hearing, the court noted the filing of a withdrawal memo. The writ petition was accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGI
WRIT PETITION No.1136/2020 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN:
SMT. M.R. SAROJA, W/O. LATE N. RUDRAPPA, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, RESIDING AT KALLAVVANAGATHIHALLI, HOLALKERE TALUK-577 526 CHITRADRUGA DISTRICT.
… PETITIONER
(BY SRI B.M. SIDDAPPA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
2
3
… RESPONDENTS
(SRI R. SHASHIDHAR, ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2; R6, R8 & R10 ARE SERVED; NOTICE TO R3 TO R5 HELD SUFFICIENT)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER PASSED BY THE LEARNED PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE, HOLALKERE IN O.S. NO. 95/2013 DATED 19.06.2019 ON I.A. NO.14 VIDE ANNEXURE - G AND ORDER DATED 17.10.2019 ON IA NO.15 VIDE ANNEXURE-L.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCE AT BENGALURU MADE THE FOLLOWING;
O R D E R
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
the petitioner has filed a memo for withdrawal of the
writ petition.
4
2. The memo is placed on record. Writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/JUDGE
SBS*
2 provisions across 1 enactments
SMT. M.R. SAROJA
SMT. HANUMAKKA
SMT. HANUMAVVA
SRI GOVINDAPPA
SRI BILLALI SANNAPPA
SRI MUDALAGIRIYAPA
ASHOK S. KINAGI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
