Petitioner sought writ under Article 227 to quash an order in O.S. No.196 of 2016. On preliminary hearing, counsel sought to withdraw the petition with liberty to file an application for striking out issues, which the court allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGI
WRIT PETITION No.1780/2022 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN:
MR. SHEKHARA SHETTY, S/O. LATE AKKANNA SHETTY, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, R/AT GANDOTYA HOUSE, HOSAMANE, PERMUDE VILLAGE, BAJPE, MANGALORE-575 030
… PETITIONER
(BY SRI SACHIN B.S., ADVOCATE)
AND:
2
R/AT KATLA KELAGINAMANE, IDYA VILLAGE, SURATHKAL, MANGALORE-575 030
3
SHIBAROOR, MANGALORE-575 030
4
5
6
MENNABETTU VILLAGE, MANGALORE-575 030
7
R/AT KALLATA HOSAMANE, PERUMUDE VILLAGE, MANGALORE-575 030
8
AGED 71 YEARS, R/AT KALLATTA HOSAMANE, PERUMUDE VILLAGE, MANGALORE-575 030
… RESPONDENTS
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DTD.04.01.2022 IN O.S. NO.196 OF 2016 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CMJ MANGALORE, D.K. VIDE ANNEXURE-A1.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCE AT BENGALURU MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave of the Court to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to file an application for striking out issues.
9
2. The submission is placed on record. Writ
petition is dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty.
Sd/JUDGE
SBS*
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Mr. Shekhara Shetty
Mr. Rukmayya Shetty
Mrs. Geetha
Mrs. Baby
Mr. Goverdana Shetty
Ms. Gulabi Shetty
Ashok S. Kinagi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
