The High Court of Karnataka dismissed a regular second appeal under Section 100 of CPC as withdrawn, based on a memo filed by the appellants' counsel on the date of hearing.
Appeal dismissed as withdrawn under Section 100 of CPC.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.923 OF 2019 (PAR)
BETWEEN:
SRI RANGAHANUMAIAH (SINCE DEAD REP BY HIS LRS)
2
THE APPELLANTS NO.1 TO 7 ARE RESIDENTS OF YELACHAGUPPA VILLAGE THAVAREKERE HOBLI BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT - 562130
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI.SHIVAKUMAR N, ADVOCATE)
AND
3
R/AT 2ND CROSS, NEAR LAKSHMI TEMPLE YESHWANTHAPURA HOBLI BENGALURU NORTH TALUK BENGALURU - 560022
4
SMT. LAKSHMAMMA SINCE DEAD BY LRS (RESPONDENT NO.11 IN TRIAL COURT)
5
RESPONDENT NOS.11 AND 12 ARE RESIDING AT RAMAIAHGALLI, RAJKUMAR CIRCLE B H ROAD, NELAMANGALA BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT
RESPONDENT NOS.13 TO 15 ARE R/AT KEMPEGOWDA CIRCLE KUNIGAL BYEPASS NELAMANGALA BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 562123
6
NELAMANGALA BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT
PIN - 562123
…..RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI.A.SAMPATH, ADVOCATE FOR R.1 TO 18)
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 01.03.2019 PASSED IN R.A.NO.16/2017 ON THE FILE OF THE III ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, RAMANAGARA, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 20.01.2017 PASSED IN O.S.NO.313/2014 (OLD NO.419/2010) ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MAGADI AND ETC.
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel appearing for appellants has filed a
memo dated 08.09.2022 seeking withdrawal of the appeal as not pressed.
7
as withdrawn.
All pending interlocutory applications, if any, do not survive for consideration and accordingly, stands
dismissed.
Sd/JUDGE
NBM
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Rangahanumaiah (since dead rep by his LRS) and others
Sakamma and others
Sachin Shankar Magadum
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
