Anandaraju v. Shankarananda
Case brief
What is this about?
A regular second appeal was dismissed as withdrawn upon filing a memo seeking withdrawal due to settlement through Lok-Adalath by the parties.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2022
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.848 OF 2019 (MON)
BETWEEN:
- ANANDARAJU, S/O SWAMYNATHAN, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,
- KUMARI SNEHA, D/O ANANDARAJU, AGED ABOUT 19 YEARS,
- KUMARI PREETHI D/O ANANDARAJU, AGED ABOUT 18 YEARS,
ALL ARE R/O C/O RAJASHEKAR, NO.57, SRIGANDHA KAVALU, SUNKADAKATTE, KABBADAHALL MAIN ROAD, BYRAVESHWARA NAGARA, OPPOSITE GAYATHRI DEVI TEMPLE, VISHWANEEDAM POST, BANGALORE-560091.
THE APPELLANTS 2 AND 3 HAVE BECOME MAJOR AT THE TIME OF FILING THE ABOVE APPEAL.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Anandaraju, S/o Swamynathan
- appellant
Kumari Sneha, D/o Anandaraju
- appellant
Kumari Preethi D/o Anandaraju
- respondent
Shankarananda, S/o Chikkathimmaiah
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- RSA/848/2019
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court