In RSA No. 645 of 2015, Justice Sachin Shankar Magadum dismissed the appeal as withdrawn following a memo filed by the appellant's counsel, subsequently disposing of pending interlocutory applications.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM
R.S.A NO. 645 OF 2015(RES)
BETWEEN:
M KRISHNAPPA S/O LATE MUNIRAMIAH@MUNIRAPPA SINCE DEAD BY LRS
1-4 ARE R/AT MEDAHALLI VILLAGE BIDARHALLI HOBLI, BENGALURU-49
2
PRESENTLY R/AT NO. 110 11TH CROSS, VISVESHWARAIAH BADAVANE, RAMAMURTHYNAGAR POST BANGALURU-560016
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI PRASANNA KUMAR C S, ADVOCATE FOR KUMAR & KUMAR ADVOCATES)
AND:
2A). SUBBAMMA W/O NAGAPPA.M AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS
2B). RAMAKKA D/O M NAGAPPA AGED MAJOR.
2C). VENKATAMMA D/O M NAGAPPA AGED MAJOR.
2D). JAYAMMA D/O M NAGAPPA AGED MAJOR.
3
2E). JAYARAM S/O M NAGAPPA
2F). LOKESH S/O M NAGAPPA AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS THE RESPONDENTS NO.2(A-F) ARE R/AT MEDAHALLI VILLAGE, BIDARAHALLI HOBLI BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK-49
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI.M.S.VARADARAJAN, ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI.MAHENDRA S S, ADVOCATE FOR C/R2(E), R2(B-F); SRI.T.SESHAGIRI RAO, ADVOCATE FOR R3; R2(A), R3(G) ARE SERVED & UNREPRESENTED)
THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 23.02.2015 PASSED IN R.A NO.258/2011 ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, BENGALURU, PARTLY ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND MODIFYING THE JUDGMENT DATED 27.07.2011 PASSED IN F.D.P NO.38/2006 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE, BENGALURU (R) DIST., BENGALURU, ALLOWING THE FINAL DECREE PROCEEDINGS. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
4
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the appellants has filed a memo
seeking withdrawal of the appeal.
Memo is taken on record.
The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
The pending interlocutory applications do not survive for
consideration and the same stand disposed of accordingly.
Sd/JUDGE
CA
M KRISHNAPPA S/O LATE MUNIRAMIAH@MUNIRAPPA SINCE DEAD BY LRS
1. RAMAKKA W/O LATE KRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS
2. AMARAVATHI W/O BASAVARAJU AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS
3. LAKSHMI DEVI W/O RAJAPPA AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS
4. RAMANJANAMMA D/O LATE M KRISHNAPPA
5. KAVITHA W/O AMBARISH KOWDENAHALLI
SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
